Tunisia: World Bank suspends new lending to Tunisia after President Saied issued racist comments

Posted On 8 March 2023

Number of times this article was read : 498
The North Africa Journal's WhatsApp Group

The North Africa Journal’s WhatsApp Group

By Paul Raymond:

The World Bank has effectively suspended new lending to cash-strapped Tunisia after President Kais Saied sparked accusations of racism with incendiary comments against sub-Saharan African migrants. Migrants from sub-Saharan Africa have faced a wave of violence in the country and many hundreds have been made homeless in the two weeks since Saied ordered “urgent measures” against them, claiming without evidence that their presence represented a “criminal plot” to change the country’s demographic make-up.

In response, the World Bank’s outgoing President David Malpass told the body’s staff in an email on Sunday evening that the institution had indefinitely postponed a key board meeting on Tunisia, saying Saied’s tirade had triggered “racially motivated harassment and even violence”.  Tunisia is stuck in a grinding economic crisis that has seen inflation hit 10.4 percent and unemployment reach 15.2 percent, according to the latest official figures.

What is the immediate impact for Tunisia?

Top World Bank officials had been set to meet on March 21 to discuss the body’s “Country Partnership Framework” laying out priorities in Tunisia until 2027. Malpass said that meeting had now been “postponed until further notice”. A World Bank official, who asked not to be named, said it was unlikely any new funding would be approved until the “situation is clarified” and the framework agreed.

Tunisian economist Ezzeddine Saidane said the lender’s move would have “a very bad impact on Tunisia’s financial situation”. The North African country is heavily indebted and needs to borrow billions of dollars more to balance this year’s budget. “The World Bank’s absence will make this very difficult and complicated,” Saidane said. “The question now is how Tunisia will finance its public spending and reform programmes?”

Will the move affect an IMF deal?

Tunisians have endured years of mounting economic pain, made worse by the coronavirus pandemic and the fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The country has been in talks since 2021 with the World Bank’s fellow global lender, the International Monetary Fund, for a $2-billion bailout loan. Those negotiations, partly dependent on funding from the bank, could now be pushed further down the line.

The official told AFP that “now that the World Bank has done the right thing” in response to the migration row, the IMF would face pressure not to approve a bailout. “The IMF might be reluctant to approve a deal that was controversial to start with, especially now that another big Washington-based lender is retreating,” the official said.

What happens now?

The Tunisian government has yet to respond directly to the World Bank’s move. Saidane said it was vital that authorities “find a way to turn a page on this affair and rebuild trust with international financial institutions”. “This will depend on the government’s reaction,” he said.  Malpass said in his email that the lender would “remain fully engaged” in Tunisia, and stressed that the safety of its many sub-Saharan African staff was a priority.

Meanwhile, talks on World Bank funding for Tunisia — notably a 20-million-euro ($21-million) loan to help build a cable to export solar power to Europe — are on hold. “It’s unlikely that new projects will be approved until after the Country Partnership Framework is approved,” the World Bank official said. “The more this drags on, the more funding Tunisia will lose.”

AFP
Other Articles in this Week's Issue<< Tunisian regime accuses former head of Truth and Dignity Commission of falsifying reportTunisia: President’s racist speech sparks violence against migrants >>
The North Africa Journal's WhatsApp Group
.

Most Recent Stories from the Region

Written by The North Africa Journal

The North Africa Journal is a leading English-language publication focused on North Africa. The Journal covers primarily the Maghreb region and expands its general coverage to the Sahel, Egypt, and beyond, when events in those regions affect the broader North Africa geography. The Journal does not have any affiliation with any institution and has been independent since its founding in 1996. Our position is to always bring our best analysis of events affecting the region, and remain as neutral as humanly possible. Our coverage is not limited to one single topic, but ranges from economic and political affairs, to security, defense, social and environmental issues. We rely on our full staff analysts and editors to bring you best-in-class analysis. We also work with sister company MEA Risk LLC, to leverage the presence on the ground of a solid network of contributors and experts. Information on MEA Risk can be found at www.MEA-Risk.com.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This