Morocco: Court upholds outrageous prison terms for Hirak leaders

Posted On 12 April 2019

Number of times this article was read : 68

Rabat, April 10, 2019 – Human Rights Watch on Wednesday warned Rabat over what it called the “shocking” Moroccan court of appeal rulings against 42 leaders of a protest movement. “The shocking appeals verdict upholding up to 20-year sentences… failed to deal with the evidence of torture and forced confessions,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, HRW’s Middle East and North Africa director.

“Morocco’s doubling down on vengeance against activists will come back to bite, as popular outrage to government abuses spreads across the region,” Whitson cautioned in a statement issued by the New York-based rights watchdog.

The leaders of the Hirak protest movement which rocked northern Morocco in 2016 and 2017 had their sentences upheld by an appeal court in the city of Casablanca last Friday. The Al-Hirak al-Shaabi, or “Popular Movement”, protests took hold of the country’s Rif region in October 2016. The social unrest was sparked by the death of a fisherman and spiralled into a wave of demonstrations demanding more development in the neglected region. Authorities accused the activists of having separatist aims.

by AFP


Morocco upholds sentences against Hirak protesters

Casablanca, Morocco, April 6, 2019 (AFP) – Dozens of activists linked to the Hirak protest movement that rocked northern Morocco in 2016 and 2017 had prison sentences of up to 20 years upheld by a court of appeal on Friday.   The ruling against the 42 protesters in the western city of Casablanca was met with cries of “corrupt state” from relatives.   The Al-Hirak al-Shaabi, or “Popular Movement”, protests took hold in the country’s marginalised Rif region in October 2016.

   The social unrest was sparked by the death of a fisherman and escalated into a wave of demonstrations demanding more development in the neglected region and railing against corruption and unemployment.   Authorities accused the activists of having separatist aims.  The sentences were first handed down in June last year, prompting further demonstrations calling for the group’s release, backed by human rights organisation such as Amnesty and Human Rights Watch.   “There is no hope… this trial has been unfair since the start and that is how it has ended,” said defence lawyer Souad Brahma. The movement’s leader Nasser Zefzafi and three others received prison terms of 20 years for threatening the security of the state.

   Other sentences also confirmed on appeal ranged from one to 15 years. Eleven others were pardoned last year by King Mohammed VI.   Journalist Hamid el Mahdaoui was sentenced to three years for failing to tell police he had been offered weapons during the protests — what he called an “imaginary crime”.  “It’s an injustice,” his wife told AFP.

   Zefzafi, 39, emerged as the face of the movement as a result of his rallying speeches, accusing the authorities of corruption.  Amnesty International has said the activist was held in solitary confinement and subjected to “conditions tantamount to torture”. He boycotted the appeal proceedings along with 37 other defendants, after
denouncing the first case as a “political trial”.  In response to criticism, the Moroccan authorities have insisted the judicial process has followed international standards.  The 2016 and 2017 protests led to clashes between police and demonstrators, leaving people injured on both sides.

   More than 600 security forces personnel were wounded and seven million dirhams ($730,000) of damage caused, according to Moroccan authorities. Around 450 people were arrested.  “It’s the politics of fear, that has been operating for some time already, telling everyone who has demands that it’s better to stay quiet,” said
left-wing politician Nabila Mounib of Friday’s ruling.  Defence lawyer Mohamed Aghennaj suggested the defendants could appeal the decision.

The North Africa Journal's WhatsApp Group
.

Most Recent Stories from the Region

Book: Lafarge Group and the Islamic State

Book: Lafarge Group and the Islamic State

Lafarge’s indictment for financing terrorism reveals corporate entanglements with ISIS to maintain operations in Syria. In Personne morale, Justine Augier exposes how multinationals like Lafarge navigate ethics and profit in conflict zones, raising questions on global accountability.

Written by The North Africa Journal

The North Africa Journal is a leading English-language publication focused on North Africa. The Journal covers primarily the Maghreb region and expands its general coverage to the Sahel, Egypt, and beyond, when events in those regions affect the broader North Africa geography. The Journal does not have any affiliation with any institution and has been independent since its founding in 1996. Our position is to always bring our best analysis of events affecting the region, and remain as neutral as humanly possible. Our coverage is not limited to one single topic, but ranges from economic and political affairs, to security, defense, social and environmental issues. We rely on our full staff analysts and editors to bring you best-in-class analysis. We also work with sister company MEA Risk LLC, to leverage the presence on the ground of a solid network of contributors and experts. Information on MEA Risk can be found at www.MEA-Risk.com.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This