Maghreb Edition

Jabaroot, the Telegram Account That Has the Moroccan State on EdgeF

Posted On 29 May 2026

Number of times this article was read : 200

By Mondafrique – This is a modest Telegram account with no official newsroom, no headquarters, and no spokesperson. Yet every time “Jabaroot” publishes something, part of Morocco’s elite holds its breath.

Who is behind Jabaroot? It was under this name that the hacking of Morocco’s National Social Security Fund (CNSS) was claimed in 2025, triggering a state of shock. The operation, allegedly carried out by “Algerian patriots,” was presented as a response to the “harassment suffered by Algerian official institutions on social media originating from Morocco.” As a result, the salaries of approximately two million Moroccans were published on Telegram, including those of major business leaders heading companies owned by the royal family.

Ministries, security agencies, public-sector executives, elected officials, senior military officers, and business intermediaries all know that a simple message posted on Telegram can trigger a political, media, or institutional shockwave. In the corridors of power, as well as in the drawing rooms of Rabat and Casablanca, the account has become a subject of conversation in its own right. It is consulted discreetly. Criticized publicly. Feared quietly.

For several years, this Telegram channel has built a unique reputation as an anonymous actor capable of disclosing sensitive information, mainly originating from Morocco’s notarial database, often before it reaches traditional media outlets. With every new publication, the same question arises: who is behind Jabaroot?

A Machine for Revelations

The Jabaroot phenomenon relies on a remarkably effective formula: publishing information with significant economic, political, or security implications, often in the form of documents, internal memoranda, or disclosures targeting public officials.

Some publications have fueled controversies involving allegations of corruption, conflicts between centers of influence, and supposed rivalries within the state apparatus.

The account has also become known for repeated references to tensions among senior security and administrative officials, reinforcing the idea of an internal cold war at the top of the system.

In several cases, information first mentioned on the channel was later discussed unofficially in political circles or indirectly relayed through social media, strengthening the impression that Jabaroot had privileged access to internal sources.

It is precisely this ability to blur the line between authentic leaks, partial information, and staged narratives that has built its power.

Jabaroot does not operate like a traditional media outlet. It operates like a psychological weapon. Its influence does not depend solely on the accuracy of each publication, but on the uncertainty it creates. When a confidential document appears online, even without absolute proof of authenticity, it can be enough to trigger internal tensions, administrative investigations, and media score-settling. A quiet panic spreads through the institutions concerned.

In a system where confidentiality is a pillar of power, a leak becomes an act of destabilization. That is precisely what gives the account its strength: no one truly knows the extent of its network.

Whistleblower or Score-Settling?

To its supporters, Jabaroot is a digital whistleblower. A raw counterweight to power emerging in a media environment viewed as overly cautious, or even too accommodating, toward decision-making centers. The account would therefore represent public anger over opacity, privilege, and arrangements among elites.

To its critics, the channel is closer to a sophisticated influence operation: a tool used in factional struggles, fed by insiders seeking to weaken political, economic, or security rivals.

Jabaroot’s model resembles that of many anonymous accounts that have appeared in various countries, combining credible revelations, murky score-settling, coded messages, and clandestine communication.

But who feeds Jabaroot? That is the question haunting both the targets of its leaks and the Moroccan public.

Several theories circulate in Rabat. Could it be a former senior official pushed out of the system? There appears to be too much information for a single individual. Could it be a network of dissident civil servants? That seems unlikely given the breadth of the leaks and the continued anonymity of those behind them. Could it involve actors linked to security agencies? That is debatable, since the leaks have affected everyone from senior military officers to intelligence officials and even personnel connected to the royal palace.

Some even suggest that it may be a collective rather than an isolated individual.

What is particularly striking is the precision of certain publications: mastery of administrative language, sensitive timing, knowledge of internal procedures, and the release of documents that are difficult for the general public to access. In other words, Jabaroot appears to know the inner workings of the state inside and out.

Telegram, a Refuge for Invisible Wars

Jabaroot’s choice of Telegram is no accident. In many countries, the platform has become a preferred space for leaks, influence campaigns, digital opposition movements, and parallel communications.

Enhanced anonymity, rapid dissemination, and limited moderation provide all the ingredients needed to transform a simple channel into a political echo chamber.

In Morocco, where official communication remains tightly controlled, Telegram offers ideal ground for actors seeking to bypass traditional information channels.

Ultimately, the Jabaroot phenomenon reveals less about the power of one person than about the fragility of a broader climate.

If thousands of people follow this type of account, it is also because part of the public believes that certain truths circulate more freely through unofficial channels than through official ones.

Jabaroot’s success reflects both distrust of elites and fascination with the secrets of power. It demonstrates a genuine demand for transparency in a society where rumors often fill the void left by missing information.

The account has understood one essential thing: in the digital age, mystery can be more powerful than identity.

And as long as no one truly knows who is speaking behind Jabaroot, every publication will continue to produce the same effect in the upper ranks of the Moroccan state: tense silence, followed by concern.

By Mondafrique

 

Subscribe to Urgent Notifications and Newsletter

Most Recent Stories from the Region

Mali: Bamako Under SiegeF

Bamako is facing mounting pressure as jihadist group JNIM expands its campaign beyond military operations and increasingly targets the economic lifelines connecting Mali’s capital to the rest of West Africa. Attacks on highways, freight traffic, and commercial transport corridors have disrupted trade, affected regional commerce, and raised concerns about the government’s ability to maintain security and economic stability.

German Think Tank Accuses the UAE of Destabilizing AfricaF

A report published by Germany’s Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik accuses the United Arab Emirates of playing a destabilizing role in several African conflicts through support for armed groups, logistical networks, and regional interventions. The report focuses particularly on Sudan, Libya, the Horn of Africa, and Yemen, while also criticizing Western governments for avoiding direct public criticism of Abu Dhabi.

Tunisian Army Denies Rumors of a Power GrabF

Tunisia’s military has publicly reaffirmed its neutrality amid growing political tensions and speculation about its role in the country’s future. The rare statement from the Ministry of Defense comes as Tunisia faces mounting economic, political, and institutional pressures, raising questions about the military’s relationship with President Kais Saied and its role in preserving state stability.

Written by The North Africa Journal

The North Africa Journal is a leading English-language publication focused on North Africa. The Journal covers primarily the Maghreb region and expands its general coverage to the Sahel, Egypt, and beyond, when events in those regions affect the broader North Africa geography. The Journal does not have any affiliation with any institution and has been independent since its founding in 1996. Our position is to always bring our best analysis of events affecting the region, and remain as neutral as humanly possible. Our coverage is not limited to one single topic, but ranges from economic and political affairs, to security, defense, social and environmental issues. We rely on our full staff analysts and editors to bring you best-in-class analysis. We also work with sister company MEA Risk LLC, to leverage the presence on the ground of a solid network of contributors and experts. Information on MEA Risk can be found at www.MEA-Risk.com.